Homebase for AtHomeCharlotte.com

Real Estate Information

"It's a Whole New Ballgame"

INNINGS

1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH EXTRA
BUYERS CREDIT LOANS PLANNING KNOWNS BROKERS MARKET NEGOTIATIONS APPRAISALS CLOSING WHAT IF?
SELLERS FOR SALE PLANNING CLEARING APPEAL DISCLOSURE OPEN HOUSE THE OFFER APPRAISALS CLOSING WHAT IF?
"...amazing website, contains wealth of information about Charlotte real estate...a must visit."
Editors, Charlotte Magazine Real Estate Roundup .

CWAC Neighborhoods
 

The earlier quality of life studies were focused exclusively on the 73 City Within a City (CWAC) neighborhoods. As a consequence the quality of life indices that were calculated did not include wealthier, more suburban communities. A review of Table 3 shows that CWAC neighborhoods remain structurally and socially disadvantaged when compared with the larger community. On almost all of the variables used in the study, the CWAC neighborhoods fall below the citywide norm. 

In this report the CWAC neighborhoods have been treated in the same fashion and subjected to the same standards as all Charlotte neighborhoods. This new research framework will permit citywide bench marking of neighborhood quality of life in the future. Consequently, Charlotte citizens and leaders will be able to track the changes in quality of life across communities and within small geographies. 

While this new framework is overwhelmingly positive, the immediate impact on CWAC neighborhoods is to make them appear as if they have declined in quality of life from the 1997 study. This is not the case. Rather, the new larger-scale study area has effectively raised the standard for inclusion in the stable and threatened categories. Thus, inner city neighborhoods that have been historically disadvantaged are now being measured against new suburban communities. This produces an appearance decline in the CWAC neighborhoods that is not real. 

This relationship is clearly shown when the 73 CWAC neighborhoods are separated from the larger citywide NSA pool, and a parallel analysis is carried out on the CWAC communities using 20 variables. Figure 4 presents the CWAC-only analysis findings. 

A review of these data show that a number of stable communities has grown significantly, from 24 in 1997 to 30 in 2000, and that there has been an accompanying decline in fragile neighborhoods from 15 to 11. Although the number and composition of the quality of variables has changed between the two studies, thus making direct comparison impossible, the strategic shift to stable neighborhoods supports the conclusion that CWAC neighborhoods are making substantial strides in community quality of life. 

Future citywide quality of life indices will, we expect, provide further support for these limited data. 

Table 3. CWAC Data Values Compared to the City of Charlotte  

Variable

CWAC

Value

City

Value

Social

Percent of Persons Receiving

Food Stamps

10.8%

4.9%

Percent of Persons over Age 64

13.6%

10.5%

Average Kindergarten Score

2.4

2.6

Dropout Rate

12.7%

8.3%

Percent of Children Passing

Competency Exams

34.4%

53.1%

Percent of Births to Adolescents

13.3%

7.6%

Youth Opportunity Index

N/A

N/A

Number of Neighborhood

Organizations

N/A

N/A

Crime

 

Violent Crime Rate

2.0

1.0

Juvenile Crime Rate

1.1

1.0

Property Crime Rate

1.4

1.0

Crime Hot Spots

N/A

N/A

Physical

 

Appearance Index

N/A

N/A

Percent Substandard Housing

5.0%

1.6%

Percent Homeowners

45.5%

57.2%

Projected Infrastructure

Improvement Costs

N/A

N/A

Percent of Persons with

Access to Public Transportation

91.7%

65.0%

Percent of Persons with

Access to Basic Retail

18.4%

17.1%

Pedestrian Friendliness Index

Low

Low

Economic

 

 

Percent Change in Income

19.0%

26.0%

Back

Got, Alotta, Charlotte!


Return to
Line-Up
Menu

Contact Info     Index         Legal       Intention      Regulatory Agencies
2008 Copyright. All Rights Reserved. AtHomeCharlotte.comŽ Inc.
The Real Estate LadyŽ and Condo CanDoŽ
SM  Lynnsy Logue 1989 USPTO