|

Mar. 07, 2006
...and still more about Cherry...
IN MY
OPINION / DANNYE ROMINE POWELL
DANNYE ROMINE POWELL
If I were in fourth grade, I'd be waving my hand
around, dying to tell you what I found out.
|
The Charlotte Observer
Apr. 08, 2005
Saving Cherry
Without city action, historic black
community will be lost
Can Cherry, a century-old African
American neighborhood of affordable housing, be preserved? It's beginning
to look as if the answer is no. Unless city leaders step in, the
neighborhood will almost certainly be lost to gentrification.
Cherry, which was named in 1891
but probably predates the Civil War, is a marvel of survival. For decades
it offered black Charlotteans a place where they could own a small home
and grow a garden. Meanwhile, all around it, farms developed into the
Myers
Park
neighborhood,
Independence Boulevard
and the Midtown shopping area. Nearby property values have soared.
Cherry's land values haven't,
though, probably due to the many houses in poor repair, plus lingering
racism, which can depress property values in many black neighborhoods.
But unless it gets protection from
relentless economic forces, Cherry will succumb. Over the years developers
have bought and demolished houses on its fringe. That process will
continue, with higher land values creeping farther into the neighborhood's
heart. Rising tax bills will force landlords to raise rents and push
low-income and elderly homeowners to sell out.
Or maybe Cherry becomes the next
NoDa, with urban pioneers refurbishing its houses. That, too, raises
property values. In either case, the neighborhood's low-income residents
would eventually be displaced.
News came last month that the
nonprofit Cherry Community Organization intends to sell at least 45 of the
90 properties it owns to developers, who would raze them and build condos.
Longtime CCO president Phyllis Lynch told Observer reporter Michelle
Crouch that units would be set aside for low-income residents and no one
would be forced out of Cherry.
But even if the CCO and its
developers can keep the project affordable -- a big if
-- demolishing so much of the housing stock would dramatically change
Cherry's historic fabric.
And can the condo project succeed
in offering a stable supply of affordable housing and providing money so
the CCO can help the neighborhood? The group's history makes us skeptical.
It hasn't filed IRS documents required yearly from nonprofits since 1998.
Audits in 1987 and 1991 found sloppy finances and undocumented payments.
More than a third of its homes are boarded up. Code violations are common.
Affordable housing experts say
trying to preserve low-income neighborhoods in high-value areas is among
the toughest challenges they face. Mike Pitchford, a former Bank of
America community development executive who was president of the National
Housing Conference, said that in such cases, "Gentrification is
almost a slam dunk if you're not careful."
If the city's leaders and housing
advocates want to preserve Cherry as a historic oasis for those of modest
income, they must act quickly. What's needed is a wide-ranging
stakeholders' group that includes experts in urban planning, preservation
and affordable housing. It should produce a strong master plan to preserve
and lift Cherry, ensuring affordability, and a strategy to make it happen.
Without
that kind of decisive action, the Cherry of old will almost certainly
vanish into memory. That has been the fate of too much of
Charlotte
's black history. It shouldn't happen to Cherry.
Link to wonderful history
of Cherry: Click Here.
|