To get Charlotte's approval to
build a parking lot, Lowe's Motor Speedway agreed to protect
hundreds of trees.
Three months later, it whacked
almost all of them.
Speedway officials took down the
trees just before the Coca-Cola 600, saying they needed to improve
visibility to attract race fans to the new parking lot on U.S. 29 in
Mecklenburg County. The result, they said, was much better traffic
flow before and after the race. They said they thought they had
permission.
As the city decides how to
penalize the speedway, the loss of the trees underscores a
little-known but troubling trend in a city known for its leafy
canopy:
Developers regularly pledge to
preserve woods or specific trees when seeking a rezoning. But the
trees often end up dead.
Many are cut after developers
change site plans. Others die under the stress of nearby
construction. And in a growing number of cases, developers break
their promises.
Specific numbers are hard to come
by, but a zoning administrator and the city's senior urban-forestry
specialist estimate about half the trees developers pledge to save
don't make it.
Some say that's especially
worrisome in a county that lost more than a third of its forest
cover between 1990 and 2002.
"It's a losing battle for
our trees," said Laura Brewer, the city's forestry specialist.
"In many cases, the philosophy seems to be: Don't ask for
permission, ask for forgiveness."
Most local developers support the
city's effort to save trees, said Mark Cramer, executive director of
Real Estate and Building Industry Coalition. But he notes that
building around trees is a difficult and time-consuming task that
can add thousands to the cost of a project.
"Sometimes you spend a lot
of money and set aside a lot of land to preserve an older tree, and
it just dies on you," he said. "Younger trees are more
hearty and able to withstand things."
Protective
measures
Charlotte's tree ordinance
requires builders to plant trees along the street and preserve at
least 10 percent of the canopy in every new subdivision. The city
also requires commercial developers to plant new trees and save some
older ones.Trees get another important boost from the rezoning
process: Planners often persuade developers to save more trees than
normally required as a condition of approval for their projects.
That's what happened at the
speedway. Planners asked the developer to protect a 75-foot-wide
swath of trees between the lot and U.S. 29. The approved site plan
specifically marks the area as an "undisturbed tree save
area."
The speedway agreed to the
provision in February before the City Council approved the rezoning.
But after only 60 cars parked in the lot for the Nextel All-Star
Challenge race May 22, track officials decided they needed to make
the lot more visible before the Coca-Cola 600 the next week.
An assistant to City Manager Pam
Syfert gave them permission to remove vines, underbrush and some
lower tree limbs -- not trees, city officials said.
Yet the speedway left about 30 of
the oldest and largest trees between the lot and U.S. 29. Everything
else came down.
Bob Rourke, the track's director
of real estate, said this week that the speedway did nothing wrong.
"When Pam gives us this
`clear the underbrush' thing, I've been around the system long
enough to know -- wink, wink -- what she means: Make it work,"
he said.
He noted that city officials
never clarified what they meant by underbrush, which he interpreted
to mean smaller trees, as well as vines and brush.
Regardless, he said, the
important thing was that 300 cars used the lot for the Coca-Cola
600, allowing the speedway to clear race traffic an hour faster than
in previous races. That, he said, helps with air quality.
"The city government said
they want this area parked," Rourke said. "I can't get
hung up on a bunch of specifics about a buffer."
Syfert could not be reached.
Assistant City Manager Ron Kimble said Syfert and other city
employees told the speedway to leave the trees alone.
Fines
are rare
Zoning inspectors, who enforce
buffers and other conditions on site plans, say violations are a
constant problem.
In the University area, for
example, developers building the Macaroni Grill, the Home Depot and
the planned Lowes Foods grocery all took down trees in protected
areas, they said.
In one of the worst cases, the
contractor for Strawberry Hill shopping center in south Charlotte
mistakenly razed red oaks, white oaks and hackberry trees -- some 50
years old -- when he bulldozed on the wrong side of tape cordoning
off protected areas in 1990.
Some violations are intentional,
others are contractor errors, inspectors said.
In most cases, developers are
required to replant two to three times the number of trees they took
down as part of a so-called "mitigation plan." They face
fines up to $500 a day and construction delays if they fail to
cooperate, though Katrina Young of zoning enforcement acknowledges
that fines are rare.
Some wonder if the city needs a
tougher response. "We make them plant back more trees than they
took down, but they've already taken down the good stuff," said
Heather Davis, a zoning inspector for 12 years. "They spend a
couple thousand dollars and put in some more trees. It's not the
same -- but they've got visibility and they're happy."
In the speedway case, city
officials are analyzing the site to determine exactly how many trees
were lost, their age and their species. Then, officials will ask
Lowe's Motor Speedway to replace a specified number.
Rourke, the track's real estate
director, said planting more trees would be silly.
"Does it make any sense to
come back and plant trees that may obscure the view?" he said.
"If they come back with something Machiavellian like that, we
may have to go to court. Or (speedway owner) Bruton (Smith) will go
to the press and say, `Look how stupid this is.' "
Thursday afternoon the speedway
issued a press release thanking the city for its OK of the parking
lot, which allowed it to clear out race traffic in "record
time."
There was no mention of the
trees.
Green
Going Away
• Half
the trees developers pledge to save don't make it, city officials
say.
• Builders
are required to keep at least 10 percent of the canopy in every new
subdivision.
• Mecklenburg
lost more than a third of its tree cover between 1990 and 2002.