Homebase for AtHomeCharlotte.com

Real Estate Information

"It's a Whole New Ballgame"

INNINGS

1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH EXTRA
BUYERS CREDIT LOANS PLANNING KNOWNS BROKERS MARKET NEGOTIATIONS APPRAISALS CLOSING WHAT IF?
SELLERS FOR SALE PLANNING CLEARING APPEAL DISCLOSURE OPEN HOUSE THE OFFER APPRAISALS CLOSING WHAT IF?
"...amazing website, contains wealth of information about Charlotte real estate...a must visit."
Editors, Charlotte Magazine Real Estate Roundup .

Charlotte Trees

Mar. 05, 2004
Freedom's trees
Residents' outcry apparently saves aging cherries from the ax
Mar. 11, 2004
N.C. loses 1 million acres of forests
Tree cover at lowest level since 1930s
March 07,2004
Donation may keep tree program growing
City hopes students spur other groups to action
Apr. 07, 2004
Saved from the ax
Blossoming cherry trees in Freedom Park get a reprieve

 Fri, Jun. 11, 2004

Trees go down despite developers' pledges
Speedway cited as example of canopy-depleting trend



Staff Writer

To get Charlotte's approval to build a parking lot, Lowe's Motor Speedway agreed to protect hundreds of trees.

Three months later, it whacked almost all of them.

Speedway officials took down the trees just before the Coca-Cola 600, saying they needed to improve visibility to attract race fans to the new parking lot on U.S. 29 in Mecklenburg County. The result, they said, was much better traffic flow before and after the race. They said they thought they had permission.

As the city decides how to penalize the speedway, the loss of the trees underscores a little-known but troubling trend in a city known for its leafy canopy:

Developers regularly pledge to preserve woods or specific trees when seeking a rezoning. But the trees often end up dead.

Many are cut after developers change site plans. Others die under the stress of nearby construction. And in a growing number of cases, developers break their promises.

Specific numbers are hard to come by, but a zoning administrator and the city's senior urban-forestry specialist estimate about half the trees developers pledge to save don't make it.

Some say that's especially worrisome in a county that lost more than a third of its forest cover between 1990 and 2002.

"It's a losing battle for our trees," said Laura Brewer, the city's forestry specialist. "In many cases, the philosophy seems to be: Don't ask for permission, ask for forgiveness."

Most local developers support the city's effort to save trees, said Mark Cramer, executive director of Real Estate and Building Industry Coalition. But he notes that building around trees is a difficult and time-consuming task that can add thousands to the cost of a project.

"Sometimes you spend a lot of money and set aside a lot of land to preserve an older tree, and it just dies on you," he said. "Younger trees are more hearty and able to withstand things."

Protective measures

Charlotte's tree ordinance requires builders to plant trees along the street and preserve at least 10 percent of the canopy in every new subdivision. The city also requires commercial developers to plant new trees and save some older ones.Trees get another important boost from the rezoning process: Planners often persuade developers to save more trees than normally required as a condition of approval for their projects.

That's what happened at the speedway. Planners asked the developer to protect a 75-foot-wide swath of trees between the lot and U.S. 29. The approved site plan specifically marks the area as an "undisturbed tree save area."

The speedway agreed to the provision in February before the City Council approved the rezoning. But after only 60 cars parked in the lot for the Nextel All-Star Challenge race May 22, track officials decided they needed to make the lot more visible before the Coca-Cola 600 the next week.

An assistant to City Manager Pam Syfert gave them permission to remove vines, underbrush and some lower tree limbs -- not trees, city officials said.

Yet the speedway left about 30 of the oldest and largest trees between the lot and U.S. 29. Everything else came down.

Bob Rourke, the track's director of real estate, said this week that the speedway did nothing wrong.

"When Pam gives us this `clear the underbrush' thing, I've been around the system long enough to know -- wink, wink -- what she means: Make it work," he said.

He noted that city officials never clarified what they meant by underbrush, which he interpreted to mean smaller trees, as well as vines and brush.

Regardless, he said, the important thing was that 300 cars used the lot for the Coca-Cola 600, allowing the speedway to clear race traffic an hour faster than in previous races. That, he said, helps with air quality.

"The city government said they want this area parked," Rourke said. "I can't get hung up on a bunch of specifics about a buffer."

Syfert could not be reached. Assistant City Manager Ron Kimble said Syfert and other city employees told the speedway to leave the trees alone.

Fines are rare

Zoning inspectors, who enforce buffers and other conditions on site plans, say violations are a constant problem.

In the University area, for example, developers building the Macaroni Grill, the Home Depot and the planned Lowes Foods grocery all took down trees in protected areas, they said.

In one of the worst cases, the contractor for Strawberry Hill shopping center in south Charlotte mistakenly razed red oaks, white oaks and hackberry trees -- some 50 years old -- when he bulldozed on the wrong side of tape cordoning off protected areas in 1990.

Some violations are intentional, others are contractor errors, inspectors said.

In most cases, developers are required to replant two to three times the number of trees they took down as part of a so-called "mitigation plan." They face fines up to $500 a day and construction delays if they fail to cooperate, though Katrina Young of zoning enforcement acknowledges that fines are rare.

Some wonder if the city needs a tougher response. "We make them plant back more trees than they took down, but they've already taken down the good stuff," said Heather Davis, a zoning inspector for 12 years. "They spend a couple thousand dollars and put in some more trees. It's not the same -- but they've got visibility and they're happy."

In the speedway case, city officials are analyzing the site to determine exactly how many trees were lost, their age and their species. Then, officials will ask Lowe's Motor Speedway to replace a specified number.

Rourke, the track's real estate director, said planting more trees would be silly.

"Does it make any sense to come back and plant trees that may obscure the view?" he said. "If they come back with something Machiavellian like that, we may have to go to court. Or (speedway owner) Bruton (Smith) will go to the press and say, `Look how stupid this is.' "

Thursday afternoon the speedway issued a press release thanking the city for its OK of the parking lot, which allowed it to clear out race traffic in "record time."

There was no mention of the trees.

Green Going Away

• Half the trees developers pledge to save don't make it, city officials say.

• Builders are required to keep at least 10 percent of the canopy in every new subdivision.

• Mecklenburg lost more than a third of its tree cover between 1990 and 2002.


Michelle Crouch: (704) 358-5076; mcrouch@charlotteobserver.com

Sat, Jun. 12, 2004
Observer Forum: Letters to the Editor
Speedway tree-cutting had me steaming

I was so angry when I read "Trees go down despite developers' pledges" (Friday), about the hundreds of trees cut down at Lowe's Motor Speedway despite promises to save them. I was even more angry to read that this practice is so common, and that we've lost a third of our trees over the last decade.When my husband and I chose to relocate here 17 years ago, a big drawing factor was the canopy of trees, which made me feel immediately at home.

I urge the city to do more than give the speedway a slap on the wrist. I hope the city will calculate the cost to hire enough inspectors to monitor development and hold developers accountable. It should also determine the cost of replanting the trees lost over the past decade, then fine all developers who broke their promises. It sounds as if the Speedway will be at the top of the list.

Sandy Deem


Charlotte

City must not dismiss developers' misdeeds

Hey, city, when are you going to wake up and see the trees? Why are you letting developers tear down trees, only to replace them with saplings that will take years to grow to the size of the tree that was lost? Isn't it time to penalize developers for their misdeeds?

Does the [Speedway] developer have so big a hold on you that you're willing to dismiss it?

Kim Updegrave


Mint Hill

Speedway official knows tree ordinance a joke

It seems Bob Rourke, [Lowe's Motor Speedway director of real estate] has, as he mentioned, "been around the system long enough" to find that our city tree ordinance doesn't mean squat. "Look how stupid this is" couldn't be a more appropriate comment.J. Taylor


Charlotte

`Inspectors'? So-called guardians let us down

It is the usual custom in getting permits, etc., to submit a blueprint/plan and get necessary city/county approvals. Then the job site becomes the responsibility of the "inspectors." They must sign off that the original plan was completed, as first approved.

So what happened in this case to the inspectors? They are our guardians against cheats and corner-cutters. The inspectors should be fired and the offenders made to adhere to the original, accepted plans. In other words -- put the darn trees back. I guarantee you it will stop the next offenders.

Sid Zimberg

Thu, Jun. 17, 2004

Civility gets the ax in tree dispute


Staff Writer

DID THEY HAVE PERMISSION? | Lowe's Motor Speedway cut down hundreds of trees, sparking a bitter war of words with Charlotte's top political leaders.


A dispute over hundreds of bulldozed trees erupted into some nasty name-calling this week between the city's top elected officials and the billionaire owner of Lowe's Motor Speedway.

The public spitting match, rare in Charlotte's polite political and business circles, began Tuesday. That's when speedway owner Bruton Smith told the Observer he had permission from Mayor Pat McCrory and Mecklenburg County commissioners chairman Tom Cox to level hundreds of trees the track had promised to save.

Gentlemen, start your engines:

"Absolutely not true," said McCrory.

"Absolutely, unequivocally, unconditionally, dead-ass wrong," Cox said. "I think somebody's gotten too close to some gas fumes."

A furious Smith said if Cox can't recall their conversations, "he's got some kind of a mental problem. It may be something serious."

All three remember talking about the trees, but give different accounts. Smith said he spoke to both men on the phone and in person and "what we did was OK with them."

"I'm awfully sorry that these people to protect their fiefdoms and political aspirations seem to have lost their memories," he said. "I feel sorry for them."

The comments come a week after the Observer reported that the speedway took down the trees to make its new parking lot on U.S. 29 in Mecklenburg County more visible to race fans.

City officials say the speedway agreed to protect the trees in return for the city's OK of a zoning change that enabled the track to build the lot, a condition McCrory and Cox don't have the authority to lift.

The city plans to meet with speedway officials Friday to determine exactly what happened and assess a penalty.

McCrory knows what he wants:

"They need to make immediate restitution, replant trees -- and we mean quality trees, big trees -- and write a letter of apology to both the community and to me."

Nature vs. development

Critics say the Speedway's action is emblematic of what is happening across the region as trees fall victim to development. Mecklenburg County lost more than a third of its forest cover between 1990 and 2002, according to a recent analysis by the U.S. Forest Service and N.C. Division of Forest Resources.Assistant City Manager Ron Kimble said the city holds developers accountable for illegal tree removal. In the speedway case, he said the city has several options on penalties, but declined to elaborate before Friday's meeting.

However, an internal memo written by the city's senior urban forester and obtained by the Observer indicates the speedway would need to plant 373 trees at least two inches wide to make up for the damage.

At the industry benchmark of $250 to $300 per tree, that could cost the speedway between $93,000 and $112,000.

`We should be complimented'

Smith said planting even one tree is unacceptable.

"If they want to contest this in court, fine," he said. "I don't know how many attorneys work for me, but I would guess it's probably about 250. There's something wrong when you buy land in their fiefdom and they start dictating what you can and cannot do."

He said the area looks better now than it did before. The speedway saved about 40 of the largest trees and removed all the others, as well as vines and underbrush. They also mulched.

"It looks good. It's been cleaned up," he said. "We should be complimented on that."

City Manager Pam Syfert said her staff gave the speedway permission to remove vines, underbrush and some lower tree limbs, but no trees.

"We were trying to be flexible because the speedway is so important to the region and to tourism," she said. "But that flexibility absolutely did not extend to letting them cut down any trees." -- STAFF WRITER RICHARD RUBIN CONTRIBUTED.

-- MICHELLE CROUCH: (704) 358-5076; MCROUCH@CHARLOTTEOBSERVER.COM


LET US KNOW

Know of trees that may have been removed illegally? E-mail us at localnews@charlotteobserver.com and we'll try to check it out.

Want to Help?

Help efforts to plant and preserve trees in Mecklenburg by contributing to the Charlotte Public Tree Fund Inc., P.O. Box 31723, Charlotte, NC 28231.

TOM COX SAID

"Absolutely, unequivocally, unconditionally, dead-ass wrong," he said. "I think somebody's gotten too close to some gas fumes."

BRUTON SMITH SAID

"I'm awfully sorry that these people to protect their fiefdoms and political aspirations seem to have lost their memories," he added. "I feel sorry for them."

 

Contact Info     Index         Legal       Intention      Regulatory Agencies
2008 Copyright. All Rights Reserved. AtHomeCharlotte.com® Inc.
The Real Estate Lady® and Condo CanDo® are registered service marks with United States Patent and Trademark Office