|
Mar. 01, 2004
Housing bubble? Not likely here
Experts: Watch for rising prices to
lose steam
TONY MECIA
For the country's 70 million homeowners, the idea of
losing money on one of their biggest investments -- their house -- is a
frightening idea.
But after years of explosive gains in the value of
real estate, some economists are warning that conditions are ripe for a
cooling off of housing prices. While most experts reject the idea that
there's a national real-estate bubble waiting to burst, akin to the
collapse of tech stocks in 2000, they say rising interest rates are likely
to cause the increase in housing prices to slow in the next few years.
As house-hunting season prepares to kick off this
spring, that means that buying a house now might not be the fantastic
investment it was just a few years ago. Creeping interest rates could put
the brakes on run-away housing valuations.
But for now, interest rates remain at near historic
lows. Real-estate industry officials are quick to point out that housing
is still anticipated to appreciate and that prices have not dropped
nationally on a yearly basis since the Great Depression.
In the
Charlotte
region, experts forecast slow but steady growth in housing prices. It's
almost impossible for a bubble to burst here because for the most part,
there's no bubble: Price increases in the
Charlotte
area, like most of the South, have been among the lowest in the country,
thanks to the availability of land and abundance of affordable new
housing.
Out of 220 metro areas across the country, the
seven-county urban area centered in Mecklenburg County ranked 207th in
housing price appreciation between the third quarters of 2002 and 2003,
the most recent figures available, according to the Office of Federal
Housing Enterprise Oversight. In the
Charlotte
area, resale prices rose just 2 percent in that time and just 19 percent
in five years, below
U.S.
averages.
That means that the average $200,000 house bought in
1998 sold last year for $238,000 in the
Charlotte
area but for $276,000 nationally.
If there are areas across the country that will
suffer from housing price collapses, they're likely to be along the
coasts, in markets such as
San Francisco
,
Los Angeles
and
New York
, where the housing markets are far more unstable than here because of
limited supply. Prices in
Santa Barbara
,
Calif.
, for instance, have risen nearly 90 percent in the past five years,
according to federal data.
"You can't just develop out into the
ocean," says Doug Duncan, senior vice president and chief economist
with the Mortgage Bankers Association, which represents home-mortgage
lenders. "The coasts see bursts of more rapid but more volatile price
changes than in the middle parts of the country."
Though experiencing explosive price growth now,
coastal cities including
San Francisco
,
San Diego
and
Boston
saw housing prices fall slightly in the recession of the early 1990s. In
contrast, prices in
Charlotte
at that time continued to rise.
Duncan
is forecasting prices of existing houses to rise about 5 percent
nationally this year, down from more than 7 percent last year. Even though
many people have recently moved and are no longer looking for housing, the
arrival of immigrants and retirement of baby boomers is continuing to fuel
housing demand, he says.
Others, though, say recent increases in housing
prices are a financial disaster in the making.
One of those beating the drum most loudly about the
existence of a housing bubble is Dean Baker, economist with the Center for
Economic and Policy Research, a liberal
Washington
think tank.
As with most goods and services in a market economy,
housing prices are typically set by supply and demand. If supply is
limited but demand increases, prices will rise. That's what most
economists say is happening in certain coastal cities.
But Baker worries that there's also a psychological
element at work that's artificially driving up housing prices, producing a
bubble. He argues that just as investors expected big returns from buying
technology stocks in the late 1990s, so too are real-estate speculators
loading up on overpriced housing in anticipation of huge payoffs.
But demand, he says, will eventually soften because
rental prices are still low and more people will rent instead of buy.
About one-third of the nation's 106 million households are occupied by
renters, according to census data. That drop in demand will cause prices
to collapse, Baker says, leaving homeowners with houses worth less than
their purchase prices.
"You'll have a lot of people in a home bigger
than they can afford," he says. "You have middle class houses
that can now be selling for $500,000. There's no way on earth the middle
class can afford a $500,000 home, unless they have the belief that they
will sell it for $600,000 or $700,000."
Most economists, however, dismiss the notion of a
widespread housing bubble.
"Any analogy to stock market pricing behavior
and bubbles is a rather large stretch," Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan told a bankers' group last year. That's because housing markets
are local, not national, he explained. Also, it's more difficult to sell
houses than stocks, keeping housing prices more stable.
Economists say rising interest rates would slow price
appreciation, but interest rates are still near historic lows and are not
forecast to rise dramatically this year.
Last week, the average interest rate on a 30-year
fixed rate mortgage was 5.49 percent, according to the Mortgage Bankers
Association. A year from now, most economists predict that rates will be
in the low 6 percent range, still far from the 7.5 percent or 8 percent
needed to significantly slow the housing market.
At a forum in January, five of the nation's leading
housing economists, representing organizations including the National
Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors and
Fannie Mae, agreed that there was no national housing bubble, although
they said bubbles could appear in certain areas undergoing dramatic
changes in the work force.
Even Baker, who says there is a national bubble
waiting to burst, says prices won't fall everywhere -- probably just
places that have had large increases in recent years.
"If you didn't see a big run-up in prices, you
won't see a big fall off," he says. "I wouldn't be too worried
if I bought a home somewhere in
South Carolina
or in the center of the country."
In
Charlotte
, real estate agents say business continues to be steady, and they see no
signs of a widespread drop in prices. Of course, within any market, prices
in some areas rise dramatically while other spots see prices fall.
The Charlotte Regional Realtor Association says it is
unable to provide home-sale statistics by area, so it's difficult to know
which areas are seeing the fastest appreciation. Across the region, the
average house sold in January was listed at nearly $193,000.
But a recent analysis of property-tax records
provides some clues. Last year, the Observer found that houses in
neighborhoods surrounding uptown Charlotte, such as Dilworth, Myers Park
and Elizabeth, commanded some of the highest price gains in the county,
with buyers paying far more than assessed tax values. That appears to be
because supply is limited and many people want to live close to town.
Suburban areas such as
University City
and Ballantyne did not appreciate as rapidly, the Observer found.
The diversity of housing choices in the
Charlotte
area disproves the existence of a bubble here, says Dan Cottingham of
Cottingham-Chalk Associates.
"The reason the bubble theory is full of hot air
is we've got affordability, period," Cottingham says. "With the
stock market going up, people are feeling wealthier. They are fueling
their desire to own real estate. That is still an active trend."
|
Posted on Mon, Mar. 01, 2004
|
|
Charlotte-Area Snapshot
Housing
prices in the greater
Charlotte
area since 1998 have increased, but not as fast as the national
average of about 38 percent. Here's a snapshot of housing prices in
select local neighborhoods in 1998 and 2003.
Madison
Park
Sales prices of typical single-family homes in
this west
Charlotte
enclave increased to $161,218 from $131,270, or an average of 23
percent.Square feet: 2,000
Bedrooms:
4 |
Bath
: 2
Sale
price 1998: $134,200
Sale
price 2003: $198,500
(48 percent increase)
Tega Cay
,
S.C.
Sales prices of typical single-family homes
near
Lake
Wylie
increased to $264,162 from $206,494, or an average of 29 percent.
Square
feet: 2,674
Bedrooms:
4 |
Bath
: 2.5
Sale
price 1998: $250,000
Sale
price 2003: $263,000
(5.2 percent increase)
Idlewild
Farms
Sales prices of typical single-family homes in
this east
Charlotte
neighborhood increased to $112,399 from $111,913, or an average of
0.4 percent.Square feet: 1,175
Bedrooms:
3 |
Bath
: 2
Sale
price 1998: $107,000
Sale
price 2003: $124,950
(17 percent increase)
Montibello
Sales prices of typical single-family homes in
this south
Charlotte
area increased to $415,404 from $315,773 ,or an average of 31.5
percent
Square
feet: 3,365
Bedrooms:
4 |
Bath
: 3.5
Sale
price 1998: $349,900
Sale
price 2003: $426,800
(22 percent increase)
Cotswold
Sales prices of typical single-family homes in
this central suburb increased to $304,701 from $217,962 ,or an
average of 40 percent.
Square
feet: 2,563
Bedrooms:
3 |
Bath
: 3
Sale
price 1998: $265,000
Sale
price 2003: $340,000
(28 percent increase)
|
|
|